Understanding Family Dynamics in a Cross-Cultural Sample: A Multi-National Study
Mary Moussa Rogers, Kelly Cuccolo, Cliff McKinney, John E. Edlund, Jon E. Grahe, Martha S. Zlokovich, Lisa M. Bauer, Tatyana El-Kour, Tabea Hässler, Fanli Jia, Jill Norvilitis, Christina Shane-Simpson, R. Andrew Yockey, Leslie D. Cramblet Alvarez, Léïla Eisner, Thomas Rhys Evans, Hojjatollah Farahani, Sara Haden, Gina Hawkins, Yoshito Kawabata, Tara Stoppa, Asil Ali Özdoğru, Handan Akkas, Olenka Dworakowski, Amber Matteson, Tifani Fletcher, Anamaries Garcia Marrero, Stephanie Godleski, Courtney L. Gosnell, Lynn Heydasch, Amanda Jerge, Arazais D. Oliveros, Melahat Özge Şimşek, Jessica J. Wegman, Stephanie Wright, Sibo Zhao, Parvis Azadfallah, Rhiannon Gibbs, Christopher Koch, Israel Meth, Kalu T. U. Ogba, Irem Metin-Orta, Christopher Redker, Casiana Reyes, Lisa H. Rosen, Rhonda N. Balzarini, and Zornitsa Kalibatseva
The Family Systems Circumplex Model posits that balanced levels of cohesion and adaptability are associated with positive familial outcomes, whereas extremely high or low levels of these factors are associated with deleterious outcomes. Despite the popularity and utility of this model in Western cultures, there is a dearth of empirical data supporting its use in more culturally diverse contexts. The current, preregistered study assessed the Family Circumplex Model, cultural factors, and emerging adult outcomes across 7 countries (i.e., China, Iran, Nigeria, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom, and the United States). Participants were N = 3,593 emerging adults, mostly self-identifying as women (71.3%). Collaborators were participants in Psi Chi’s Network for International Collaborative Exchange (NICE) and administered measures related to family dynamics and cultural orientation to participants in a random order. Results indicated that the Family Circumplex Model did not fit cross-culturally. As such, a new model was adapted, the Expanded Circumplex Model, which demonstrated invariance across samples and between women and men. The Expanded Circumplex Model retained 6 constructs with differences regarding the separation of disengagement into 2 variables and the combining of adaptive flexibility and cohesion. The current study suggests that the cultural context in which family dynamics occur should be taken into consideration when conceptualizing family dynamics theory and measurement. Future work should seek to replicate and further apply the Expanded Circumplex Model to familial outcomes.
Mary Moussa Rogers, Kelly Cuccolo, Cliff McKinney, John E. Edlund, Jon E. Grahe, Martha S. Zlokovich, Lisa M. Bauer, Tatyana El-Kour, Tabea Hässler, Fanli Jia, Jill Norvilitis, Christina Shane-Simpson, R. Andrew Yockey, Leslie D. Cramblet Alvarez, Léïla Eisner, Thomas Rhys Evans, Hojjatollah Farahani, Sara Haden, Gina Hawkins, Yoshito Kawabata, Tara Stoppa, Asil Ali Özdoğru, Handan Akkas, Olenka Dworakowski, Amber Matteson, Tifani Fletcher, Anamaries Garcia Marrero, Stephanie Godleski, Courtney L. Gosnell, Lynn Heydasch, Amanda Jerge, Arazais D. Oliveros, Melahat Özge Şimşek, Jessica J. Wegman, Stephanie Wright, Sibo Zhao, Parvis Azadfallah, Rhiannon Gibbs, Christopher Koch, Israel Meth, Kalu T. U. Ogba, Irem Metin-Orta, Christopher Redker, Casiana Reyes, Lisa H. Rosen, Rhonda N. Balzarini, and Zornitsa Kalibatseva
The Family Systems Circumplex Model posits that balanced levels of cohesion and adaptability are associated with positive familial outcomes, whereas extremely high or low levels of these factors are associated with deleterious outcomes. Despite the popularity and utility of this model in Western cultures, there is a dearth of empirical data supporting its use in more culturally diverse contexts. The current, preregistered study assessed the Family Circumplex Model, cultural factors, and emerging adult outcomes across 7 countries (i.e., China, Iran, Nigeria, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom, and the United States). Participants were N = 3,593 emerging adults, mostly self-identifying as women (71.3%). Collaborators were participants in Psi Chi’s Network for International Collaborative Exchange (NICE) and administered measures related to family dynamics and cultural orientation to participants in a random order. Results indicated that the Family Circumplex Model did not fit cross-culturally. As such, a new model was adapted, the Expanded Circumplex Model, which demonstrated invariance across samples and between women and men. The Expanded Circumplex Model retained 6 constructs with differences regarding the separation of disengagement into 2 variables and the combining of adaptive flexibility and cohesion. The current study suggests that the cultural context in which family dynamics occur should be taken into consideration when conceptualizing family dynamics theory and measurement. Future work should seek to replicate and further apply the Expanded Circumplex Model to familial outcomes.Keywords: Family Circumplex Model, family dynamics, open science, cross-cultural psychology
Citation: Moussa Rogers, M., Cuccolo, K., McKinney, C., Edlund, J. E., Grahe, J. E., Zlokovich, M. S., Bauer, L. M., El-Kour, T., Hässler, B., Jia, F., Norvilitis, J., Shane-Simpson, C., Yockey, R. A., Cramblet Alvarez, L. D., Eisner, L., Rhys Evans, T., Farahani, H., Haden, S., Hawkins, G., . . . Kalibatseva, Z. (2024). Understanding family dynamics in a cross-cultural sample: A multi-national study. Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research, 29(2), 140–149. https://doi.org/10.24839/2325-7342.JN29.2.140
No comments:
Post a Comment